|
|
|

Knowing the common weaknesses of grant proposals, searching for new competitions,
and discovering how to predict upcoming funding priorities is an important
part of becoming an effective grant writer. The Center for Minority Special
Education (CMSE) developed this page to provide
advice and tips for beginning grant writers.
Table of Contents

Grant Writing Guides on the
Internet.
Table of
Contents

Start Researching Your Project Now.
It is important for you to begin planning and developing
a proposal before final grant competitions are announced.
This gives you the time to research the field and develop
your ideas, before beginning to write your proposal.
Table of
Contents

Beginning Your Grant Writing.
- Become familiar with funding sources. Who should be
contacted, when, and preferred form of contact. What the
agency or foundation supports. What is the level of
support.
- Compare your project with the purposes/objectives of
the funding source.
- Ensure that you, your project, and/or your university
or organization are eligible.
- Be aware of campus and funding agency's application
requirements, procedures and deadlines.
- Obtain and review the current or last year's
application form and/or guidelines. Follow guidelines
assiduously.
- Utilize campus resources (Library and Grants Office).
- Discuss your project and seek review of your project
with knowledgeable colleagues when possible, especially
those who may have applied to the same sponsor or who are
known to be successful proposal writers.
- Persist, persist, persist. Expect to be successful.
Revise and resubmit until funded.
Table of
Contents

Ways to Watch for Upcoming Agency
Priorities.
- Proposed priorities. Often agencies will
announce proposed priorities asking for public comment
(See the
Federal
Register). The final priorities or grant competitions
are usually announced a few months later.
- Published Reports. Many competitions are
developed after reports or studies determining need have
been published and disseminated (See the
Eighteenth
Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of
the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 1996).
Also, peruse foundation reports and studies.
- Previous Research Projects. Some competitions
are announced based on recent findings of previously
funded research projects. (Check the agency web pages to
read about past research projects.)
Table of
Contents

Finding the Grant Announcement.
- See Agency Grants Pages (Grant
Funding Information and Resources)
- Review the
Federal
Register.
- Sign up for e-mail grant updates by joining
EdInfo
(a free, weekly, U.S. Department of Education e-mail
news/information service); and for grant opportunities at
other federal agencies,
FEDIX OPPORTUNITY ALERT sponsored by the Federal
Information Exchange, Inc.
- Constantly check association, foundation and other
web pages for new grant priorities.
Table of
Contents

Information Grant Announcements
Provide.
- Aims desired by agency. The background and critical
need for the competition.
- Possible scope of the project. Specific information
and priorities that must be met by the proposal.
- Details on the components or selection criteria of
the proposal.
- The number of points and/or weight allotted to each
component.
- The due date for specific competitions.
- Page limits for the narrative.
Table of
Contents

Thoroughly Review the Grant
Announcement.
Determine:
Table of
Contents

Increasing Your Chances for
Funding $uccess.
Begin a dialogue with the agency personnel and learn as
many important facts as you can about the competitions.
Competitions with a high probability of success are often
competitions where:
- Few proposals are submitted.
- New competitions.
- Projects for low incidence populations, e.g.,
Severe Disabilities.
- Technology.
- Many proposals are funded.
- There is a high ratio of projects funded to
submissions.
Develop proposals related to:
- Your professional strengths.
- Your current activities.
- The strengths of your institution.
Table of
Contents

Common Proposal Weaknesses
- Vague constructs and weak background references.
[KNOW THE LITERATURE! Be aware of related research. Make
sure the background (literature review) is strong with
references to previous related work.]
- Too many variables. (Specify the key variables in the
proposal.)
- Too Simple framework. (Why do this? Is the proposal
just a routine application of known techniques?)
- No specific hypotheses. (Does each hypothesis in the
proposal add new information? Is the question being
addressed clear?)
- Lacks alternate hypotheses. (KNOW THE LITERATURE.)
- The fatal flaw: Errors in design or feasibility.
- Incomplete proposals: Not enough detail.
- Serious human subject concerns.
- The proposal seems to be attempting too much for the
funding requested and the time-scale envisioned.
- Source of the funding for major items aren't defined,
aren't in the budget, or major items in the budget aren't
discussed in the narrative.
The significance of your proposal will be established on
the basis of:
- Literature background and context for the problem;
- Anticipated outcomes or processes (make sure the
outcome of the research is clear);
- How well you convince the reviewer!
|